<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JM Simon &#187; fair reward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simonlluma.eu/tag/fair-reward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simonlluma.eu</link>
	<description>Europe, environment, federalism, world governance, travel and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:57:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rewarded to destroy wealth? Recycling has higher social return than banking</title>
		<link>http://www.simonlluma.eu/2009/12/rewarded-to-destroy-wealth-recycling-has-higher-social-return-than-banking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simonlluma.eu/2009/12/rewarded-to-destroy-wealth-recycling-has-higher-social-return-than-banking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Bit Rich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics common sense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair reward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new wealth indicators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rethinking economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonlluma.eu/?p=873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are lots of new approaches about how economics should be reformed in order to allow prices to tell the truth, internalising future or environmental costs, integrating scarcity in the equation, new indicators of wealth, etc.  All these topics which might have looked revolutionary or idealist not too long ago are not provocative anymore for <a href='http://www.simonlluma.eu/2009/12/rewarded-to-destroy-wealth-recycling-has-higher-social-return-than-banking/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simonlluma.eu/2009/12/rewarded-to-destroy-wealth-recycling-has-higher-social-return-than-banking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

