Ok, we got what we what we deserved: a fully-fledged recession. But from bad things, good things someday come!

The austerity plans of countries like Greece, Spain or Ireland –low investment and expenditure to reduce deficit- will hamper growth and without growth they will not be able to neither finance the service of the debt nor the necessary investments to modernize and green the economy.

Greece is getting a rescue of 110 billion € and is going to have to restructure the economy in an IMF way, and few countries have ever come alive from these macroeconomic diets… The compulsory deficit reduction will imply cutting expenditure (and investments), and/or increasing revenues. If the government doesn’t succeed in bringing law enforcement to the country –making people pay taxes, work longer…- there is no way they will manage to increase the revenues.
And in the best case, cutting in the expenditures will help reduce the deficit but it won’t generate much growth and the little growth that the country might generate will go to repay the service of the debt.

Ireland and Spain were the heroes of the European growth until the machine broke and showed that their growth was the most unsustainable of all –speculation and borrowing from the future-. Now Ireland has a national debt that is 9 times the size of its GDP and Spain has an acute problem with unemployment and deficit. Spain made everyone happy in the ecofin meeting of 9th of May when it announced a cut in the deficit of 5 billion €. This cut will mean less investment in public works and hence less dynamism in the economy and less internal demand.

The PIGS (Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain) and countries like Ireland which are going through a tough macroeconomic restructuring will have problems to generate economic growth. And the little profits generated by a hypothetic economic growth will go to cover the deficit and pay the service of the debt. Hence no growth in sight… Economic history shows a continuously rising public debt in a shrinking economy is a recipe for disaster. Yet, it is difficult to see how half of the EU member states will avoid falling into such a vicious circle.

There is a burning need to raise revenues in the EU in order to break the above-mentioned spiral. The current measures won’t work: Taxing labour will do more harm than good, increasing VAT (like they want to do in Spain) has a uneven impact which won’t help, delaying going into pension is good when workers are productive but will not save the situation in the PIGS with low qualified labour.

Yet this catastrophic situation might open a door that the policy-makers –well-advised by their friends in the industry and banks- have tried to keep close until now.
Taxes are not only a way to generate revenue, they are way to steer and create markets. Therefore it is of common sense to raise taxes there where is needed in order to pave the way towards a more sustainable economic and environmental future: taxing capital and taxing carbon is the way forward.

Taxing capital transactions: The current crisis was triggered by the excessive speculation and in order to incentivate productive investment a tax on the financial speculative transactions is not only useful to raise income but it is also fair.

Tax carbon: The big challenge of the current times is the decarbonisation of the economy, whatever economy comes out of the current crisis will have to be more sustainable and efficient and less based on carbon. A tax on carbon it would help raise revenues and it would bring the right incentives to the market, pushing the economy to be less carbon-intensive.

The problem is that those who put us in the current crisis are supposed to get us out of it and, sadly, so far we have only seen old ideas to fix new problems. Someone said “Never waste a good crisis”; now the European leaders have the perfect excuse to do the right changes. The problem is that neither the industry, nor the political parties, nor even the trade unions want the change. In France, Sarkozy’s plan to tax carbon had to be left aside because in the end “nobody” –except the common people- wanted it. In Spain Zapatero –and the common people- wanted to tax capital but he had to give in to some “interests”…
Ideally the initiative should come from the European Commission but so far it hasn’t shown much initiative in anything relevant and, sadly, people tend to expect more from German government than from the European Commission.

The EU member states have been taking difficult decision regarding rescue-packages and others. Had they been bold and brave enough before we would have saved lots of tax-payers money. Latest experiences are a sad portrait of the cost of inaction; with the current pre-depression situation countries like Greece have to break the vicious circle imposed by IMF rescue plans. Taxing carbon and speculation is the right way forward and now it is the time to implement them. The longer we wait the higher the bill will be.

 

“The germans are back” is a statement I’ve been hearing quite often in different spheres and from different nationalities in Brussels. This statement is made with a mix of skepticism and fear, is this justified?

It is a fact that the current crisis –specially the Greek crisis- has triggered new waves of nationalism everywhere in Europe and history teaches that nationalism is powerless without a real or invented enemy. Germany’s predominance and power in Europe, well-anchored in its strong demographics and economics, has been translated into hate and fear during the first half of the XX century and into respect and admiration during the second half of the same century. Are we entering a new phase of German attempt to dominate Europe or does the EU offer the guarantees that this can not happen? Is this a real German strategy or it is rather the result of a lack of leadership in Europe?

In Brussels the German influence has been steadily growing and now it is more visible than ever. According to the different people I’ve been talking to: “germans are taking all strategic positions in the institutions and they work as a clan” is this true? Leaving aside the fact that all nationalities tend to work as a clan, as far as the higher positions is concerned: it looks like the new Secretary General of the Council will be a German –replacing a French- which adds to the german Klaus Welle having taken over the secretariat of the European Parliament from the British Julian Priestley. According to my experience the Germans are the best organized and coordinated country in the EU and it is practically impossible to pass any position that the Germans as a whole oppose. Again are the Germans to blame for their own efficiency or are the others to be blamed for not taking the EU seriously enough?
Can Germany be blamed for having –in comparison with other big EU states- a strong non-populist government led by a strong leader with a clear vision or should we blame the other big EU countries for the opposite?
What is undeniable is that the demographic and the economic power of Germany can be very powerful when MEPs, states, lobbies and civil servants push in the same direction. However, the whole point of building a supranational democracy is precisely to avoid countries dominating Europe and instead let the people of Europe govern the continent…

I have mixed feelings with this criticism that the Germans are facing “behind the scenes”. On one hand it is true that these last months we have seen in the German press the most nationalists comments since WWII –mainly on the Greek bail-out- and that the German society is slowly leaving behind the complexes and guilt-feelings carried since the defeat of the 3rd Reich. On the other hand during last half century Germany has been one of the most pro-european countries and if we don’t have a well-functioning and democratic European Federation right now is not because of them but because of the intermittent sabotage from the French and the Brits to projects of further political integration.
If the Germans have to take the lead of the EU today is because we don’t have an EU able to advance as one political unit. The European Commission doesn’t have neither the leadership nor the power –given by the institutional setup- to act as a government. Once again the member states have committed the mistake of thinking that by preserving their sovereignity they were better serving their citizens and even the EU. Time, once again, is proving them wrong.
But on the top of that it looks like the anger for an ill-functioning, purpose-less EU might fall on Germany precisely for being in the situation of having to take the lead which I think is unfair. Imagine for a moment where would the EU be without the current German leadership.

To conclude, it is a fact that “the Germans are back” but I remain to be convinced of whether this is either good or bad -or both at the same time-. It can be bad if the other EU member states don’t get their acts together to properly be represented and organized in the EU because the uncontested German efficiency and power will have negative consequences in the form of nationalism and mistrust with unforeseeable negative consequences for the European project.
However, it is good that the engine of Europe is leading the pack because it can have the effect of convincing the other countries that it is better to complete the political union in order to lead all together rather than leaving to the Germans full control of the steering wheel.

© 2012 JM Simon Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha